Vol. 30 No. 2 (2015)
Research Articles

Use and Perceptions of Second Life by Distance Learners: Comparison with Other Communication Media

PDF HTML ePub
  • Jo-Anne Murray,
  • Fiona Hale,
  • Marshall Dozier
Jo-Anne Murray
University of Glasgow
Bio
Fiona Hale
University of Edinburgh
Bio
Marshall Dozier
University of Edinburgh
Bio

Published 2015-08-03

How to Cite

Murray, J.-A., Hale, F., & Dozier, M. (2015). Use and Perceptions of Second Life by Distance Learners: Comparison with Other Communication Media. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 30(2). Retrieved from https://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/922
Copyright Notice

Abstract

Research has demonstrated that the use of communication media in distance education can reduce the feeling of distance and isolation from peers and tutor, and provide opportunities for collaborative learning activities (Bates, 2005). The use of virtual worlds (VW) in education has increased in recent years, with Second Life (SL) being the most commonly used VW in higher education (Wang & Burton, 2012). There is a paucity of information available on students’ use and perceptions of SL in relation to other online communication media available to the distance learner. Consequently, in the study described here, this area was explored with a group of students registered in a part-time distance education Master’s program at a large UK University open to international students. A self-completion survey was designed to assess students’ use and perceptions of using SL compared with other communication media. The majority of students rated SL lower than other forms of communications media such as email, WebCT discussion boards, Skype, and Wimba for facilitating communication, promoting the formation of social networks, fostering a sense of community, and benefiting their learning.  It is possible that the results of this study were influenced by the lower frequency of use of SL in this program compared to other work reported on this subject. Further work is required to evaluate the effect of frequency of use of SL and availability of alternative communication media on students’ use and perceptions of this virtual world.

PDF HTML ePub

References

  1. Abrami, P. C., Bernard, R. M., Bures, E. M., Borokhovski, E., & Tamim, R. M. (2011). Interaction in distance education and online learning: using evidence and theory to improve practice. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 23, 82-103.
  2. Akyol, Z., & Garrison, D. R. (2014). The development of a community of inquiry over time in an online course: Understanding the progression and integration of social, cognitive and teaching presence. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 12(3-4), 3-22.
  3. Alexander, S., & Boud, D. (2001). Learners still learn from experience when online. In Teaching and learning online: Pedagogies for new technologies. London: Kogan.
  4. Baker, S. C., Wentz, R. K., & Woods, M. M. (2009). Using virtual worlds in education: Second Life as an educational tool. Teaching of Psychology, 36, 59-64. doi:
  5. 1080/00986280802529079
  6. Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, e-learning and distance education (2nd ed.). London, UK: Routledge.
  7. Beldarrain, Y. (2012). Distance education trends: Integrating new technologies to foster student interaction and collaboration. Distance Education, 27(2), 139-153.
  8. Bielaczy, K., & Collins, A. (1999). Learning communities in classrooms: A reconceptulisation of educational practice. In C. M. Reigeluth (Ed.), Instructional-design theories and models, a new paradigm of instructional theory (Vol. 2, pp. 269-292). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
  9. Carr, S. (2000). As distance education comes of age. The challenge is keeping the students. Chronicle of Higher Education, 46(23), A39-A41.
  10. Cheung, C. M. K., Chiu, P.-Y., & Lee, M. K. O. (2011). Online social networks: Why do students use Facebook? Computers in Human Behaviour, 27(4), 1337-1343.
  11. Chickering, A., & Ehrmann, S. E. (1996). Implementing the seven principles: Technology as lever. American Association for Higher Education, 49(2), 3-7.
  12. Childress, M. D., & Braswell, R. (2006). Using massively multiplayer online role-playing games for online learning. Distance Education, 27(2), 187-196.
  13. Clark, M. A. (2011). Genome Island: A vitrual science environment in Second Life. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 12(3).
  14. Cobb, S. (2011). Social presence, satisfaction, and perceived learning of RN-to-BSN students in web-nased nursing courses. Nursing Education Perspectives, 32(2), 115-119.
  15. Crawford-Ferre, H. G., & Wiest, L. R. (2012). Effective online instruction. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11-14.
  16. Dawson, S. (2006). A study of the relationship between student communication interaction and sense of community. The Internet and Higher Education, 9, 153-162.
  17. De Lucia, A., Francese, R., Passero, I., & Tortora, G. (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of Second DMI. Computers and Education, 52, 220-233.
  18. Edirisingha, P., Nie, M., Pluciennik, M., & Young, R. (2009). Socilisation for learning at distance in a 3D multi-user virtual environment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 458-479.
  19. Ertmer, P. A., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. T., Sadik, O., Sendurur, E., & Sendurur, P. (2012). Teacher beliefs and technology integration practices: A critical relationship. Computers and Education, 59, 423-435.
  20. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133-148.
  21. Giesbers, B., Rienties, B., Tempelaar, D., & Gjselaers, W. (2014). A dynamic analysis of the interplay between asynchronous and synchronous communication in online learning: The impact of motivation. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 30(1), 30-50.
  22. Knapper, C. (1988). Lifelong learning and distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 2(1), 63-72.
  23. LeFebvre, L., & Alle, M. (2014). Teacher immediacy and student learning: An examination of lecture/laboratory and self-contained course sections. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 14(2), 29-45.
  24. Leh, A. S. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications, 7(2), 109-128.
  25. Lowe, C. (2008). Graduate student perceptions of learning in a virtual world. Paper presented at the 24th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning, Madison, WI.
  26. McKerlich, R., Riis, M., Anderson, T., & Eastman, B. (2011). Student perceptions of teaching presence, social presence and cognitive presence in a virtual world. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 324-336.
  27. Murphy, E., & Rodrigues-Manzanares, M. A. (2012). Rapport in distance education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(1), 167-190.
  28. Ogden, J., & Lo, J. (2011). How meaningful are data from Likert scales? An evaluation of how ratings are made and the role of the response shift in the socially disadvantaged. International Journal of Health Psychology, 12, 350-361.
  29. Oztok, M., Zingaro, D., Brett, C., & Hewitt, J. (2013). Exploring asynchronous and synchronous tool use in online courses. Computers and Education, 60(1), 87-94.
  30. Peters, O. (1992). Some observations on dropping out in distance education. Distance Education, 13(2), 234-269.
  31. Picciano, A. G. (2002). Beyond student perceptions: Issues of interaction, presence, and performance in an online course. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 6, 21-40.
  32. Reilly, J. R., Gallacher-Lepak, S., & Killion, C. (2012). "Me and my computer": Emotional factors in online learning. Nursing Education Perspectives, 33(2), 100-105.
  33. Rice, R. E., & Love, G. (1987). Electronic emotion: Socioemotional content in a computermediated netwrok. Communication Research, 14, 85-108.
  34. Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. (2003). Examining social presence in online courses in relation to students' perceived learning and satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(1), 68-88.
  35. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research. Oxford, UK.: Blackwell Publishing.
  36. Rovai, A. (2002). Building a sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 3(1), 1-16.
  37. Russo, T. C., & Campbell, S. (2010). Perceptions of mediated presence in an asynchronous online course: Interplay of communication behaviours and medium. Distance Education, 25(2), 215-232.
  38. Russo, T. C., & Campbell, S. W. (2004). Perceptions of mediated presence in an asynchronous online course: Interplay of communication behaviours and medium. Distance Education, 25(2), 215-232.
  39. Simkins, S., Maier, M., & Rhem, J. (2009). Just-in-Time teaching: Across the disciplines, and across the academy. New Pedagogies and Practices for Teaching in Higher Education. Virginia, US: Stylus Publishing.
  40. Slagter van Tron, P. J., & Bishop, M. J. (2009). Theoretical foundations for enhancing social connectedness in online learning environments. Distance Education, 30(3), 291-315.
  41. Sprecher, S. (2014). Initial interactions online-text, online-audio, online-video, or face-to-face: Effects of modality on liking, closeness, and other interpersonal outcomes. Computers in Human Behaviour, 31, 190-197.
  42. St John, W., & Johnson, P. (2000). The pros and cons of data analysis software for qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 32(4), 393-399.
  43. Steinkuehler, C. A., & Williams, D. (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as "third places". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 885-909.
  44. Tait, A. (2014). From place to virtual space: Reconfiguring student support for distance and e-learning in the digital age. Open Praxis, 6(1), 5-16.
  45. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Roblin, N. P., Tondeur, J., & van Braak, J. (2012). Technological paedogogical content knowledge: A review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29(2), 109-121.
  46. Wang, F., & Burton, J. K. (2012). Second Life in education: A review of publications from its launch to 2011. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44(3), 357-371.
  47. Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 40(3), 141-426.
  48. Zheng, B., & Warchauer, M. (2015). Participation, interaction, and academic achievement in an online discussion environment. Computers and Education, 84, 78-89.