Vol. 37 No. 1 (2022)
Research Articles

Patterns of Teaching Presence during One Semester of a Large Online Graduate Nursing Course

HTML PDF
  • Micah Baker,
  • Dr. Stephanie Richardson,
  • Fernando Rubio
Micah Baker
University of Utah Health
Bio
Dr. Stephanie Richardson
Bio
Fernando Rubio
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55667/ijede.2022.v37.i1.1228

Published 2022-07-08

How to Cite

Baker, M., Richardson, S., & Rubio, F. (2022). Patterns of Teaching Presence during One Semester of a Large Online Graduate Nursing Course. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.55667/ijede.2022.v37.i1.1228
Copyright Notice

Abstract

Extensive research supports the claim that student-instructor interaction is an essential element of successful online teaching. It is less clear, however, whether teaching presence is discipline-specific, or how it may be affected by the personal and professional background of individual instructors. 

This article describes the qualitative portion of a mixed-methods study to analyze patterns of commenting behaviors in a graduate-level online nursing course. Following the Community of Inquiry theoretical framework (Garrison, Anderson & Archer, 2000), we compare experienced and inexperienced instructors and specifically focus on how teaching presence evolved over a fifteen-week course. Our findings indicate that teaching experience affects the types and density of comments used by teachers. Experience played a role in how density and overall level of activity evolved as the semester progressed. No differences in teaching presence emerged when comparing instructions for each assignment, but there were differences when comparing instructions to teacher posts.

HTML PDF

References

  1. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v5i2.1875
  2. Annand, D. (2019). Limitations of the community of inquiry framework. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education/ Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 34(2). http://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1133/1746
  3. Arbaugh, J. B. (2007). An empirical verification of the community of inquiry framework. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 73–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v11i1.1738
  4. Arbaugh, J. B., Bangert, A., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2010). Subject matter effects and the community of inquiry (CoI) framework: An exploratory study. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1-2), 37–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.006
  5. Arbaugh, J. B., Cleveland-Innes, M., Diaz, S. R., Garrison, D. R., Ice, P., Richardson, J. C., & Swan, K. P. (2008). Developing a community of inquiry instruction: Testing a measure of the Community of Inquiry framework using a multi-institutional sample. The Internet and Higher Education, 11(3-4), 133–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2008.06.003
  6. Arbaugh, J. B., & Rau, B. L. (2007, January). A study of disciplinary, structural, and behavioral effects on course outcomes in online MBA courses. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 5(1), 65–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00128.x
  7. Baker, M., Richardson, S., & Rubio, F. (2020). Evaluating teaching presence in an online nursing course: Proposing a new taxonomy. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education / Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 35(2). https://www.ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/1178
  8. Benson, R., & Samarawickrema, G. (2009). Addressing the context of e‐learning: using transactional distance theory to inform design. Distance Education, 30(1), 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587910902845972
  9. Clarke, L. W., & Bartholomew, A. (2014). Digging beneath the surface: Analyzing the complexity of instructors’ participation in asynchronous discussion. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 18(3), 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v18i3.414
  10. Castellanos-Reyes, D. (2020). 20 years of the community of inquiry framework. TechTrends 64, 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-020-00491-7
  11. Christopher, R., Tantillo, L. & Watson, J. (2020). Academic caring pedagogy, presence, and Communitas in nursing education during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nursing Outlook, 68(6), 822–829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.outlook.2020.08.006
  12. Cleveland-Innes, M. & Campbell, P. (2012). Emotional presence, learning and the online learning environment. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 13(4), 269–292. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i4.1234
  13. Crouch, H. & Mazur, E. (2001, March 15). Peer Instruction: Ten years of experience and results. American Journal of Physics 69(9), 970. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.1374249
  14. Daspit, J. J. & D’Souza, D. E. (2012, July 20). Using the Community of Inquiry Framework to introduce wiki environments in blended-learning pedagogies: Evidence from a business capstone course. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 11(4), 666–668. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.0154
  15. Fagen, A. P., Crouch, C. H., Yang, T. & Mazur, E. (2000, January). Factors that make peer instruction work: A 700-user survey [Conference Session]. 2000 AAPT Winter Meeting, Kissimmee, FL. https://mazur.harvard.edu/presentations/factors-make-peer-instruction-work-700-user-survey
  16. Garrison, D. R. (2007, April). Online community of inquiry review: social, cognitive, and teaching presence issues. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(1), 61–72. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/104064/"
  17. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (Spring 1999). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education model. The Internet and Higher Education, 2(2-3), 87–105. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1096-7516(00)00016-6
  18. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T. & Archer, W. (2001, September 24). Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education. American Journal of Distance Education, 15(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923640109527071
  19. Garrison, D. R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2010, January). The first decade of the community of inquiry framework: A retrospective. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.10.003
  20. Garrison, R., & Arbaugh, B. (2007). Researching the community of inquiry framework: Review, issues, and future directions. The Internet and Higher Education, 10(3), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2007.04.001
  21. Garrison, D. R., & Cleveland-Innes, M. (2005, June 7). Facilitating cognitive presence in online learning: Interaction is not enough. American Journal of Distance Education, 19(3), 133−148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1903_2
  22. Gironzetti, E., Lacorte, M., & Muñoz-Basols, J. (2020). Teacher perceptions and student interaction in online and hybrid university language learning courses. Current Perspectives in Language Teaching and Learning in Multicultural Contexts. Thomson Reuters Aranzadi.
  23. Jarvis, K. (2019). Swanson’s Theory of Caring: An Application to the Role of Nursing Education. International Journal for Human Caring, 23(3), 266–271. https://doi.org/10.20467/1091-5710.23.3.266
  24. Johnson, J. P., & Mighten, A. (2005, July 1). A comparison of teaching strategies: lecture notes combined with structured group discussion versus lecture only. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(7), 319–322. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20050701-06
  25. Keengwe, J., & Kidd, T. T. (2010). Towards best practices in online learning and teaching in higher education. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 6(2), 533–541. https://jolt.merlot.org/vol6no2/keengwe_0610.pdf
  26. Kyei-Blankson, L., Ntuli, E. & Donnelly, H. (2019). Establishing the Importance of Interaction and Presence to Student Learning in Online Environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 30(4), 539–560. Waynesville, NC: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). https://www.learntechlib.org/primary/p/161956/"
  27. Lewis, C. & Abdul-Hamid, H. (2006, May 26). Implementing effective online teaching practices: Voices of exemplary faculty. Innovative Higher Education, 31(2), 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10755-006-9010-z
  28. Mahram, M., Mahram, B., & Mousavinasab, S. N. (2009). Comparison between the effect of teaching through student based group discussion and lecture on learning in medical students. Strides in Development of Medical Education, 5(2), 71–79. http://sdme.kmu.ac.ir/article_90140.html
  29. Major, C. H. (2010). Do virtual professors dream of electric students? University faculty experiences with online distance education. Teachers College Record, 112(8), 2154–2208. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/108751/"
  30. Mazur, E. (1997). Peer instruction: A user’s manual. Prentice Hall.
  31. Moore, M. G. (2018).The theory of transactional distance. Handbook of distance education (pp. 84–103). Routledge.
  32. Morse, J. M. (2016). Mixed method design: Principles and procedures. Routledge.
  33. Nagel, L. & Kotzé, T. G. (2010). Supersizing e-learning: What a CoI survey reveals about teaching presence in a large online class. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.12.001
  34. Neumann, Y. & Neumann, E. (2010). The robust learning model (RLM): A comprehensive approach to a new online university. Journal of College Teaching & Learning, 7(1), 27–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.19030/tlc.v7i1.76
  35. Neumann, Y. & Neumann, E. (2016, May 3). Lessons about online learning. Inside Higher Ed. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2016/05/03/what-weve-learned-after-several-decades-online-learning-essay
  36. Neumann, Y., Neumann, E. F., & Lewis, S. (2017). Quality of faculty feedback and its effects on learning and educational effectiveness of online master degree programs. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 14(3), 105–115. https://touroscholar.touro.edu/tuw_pubs/index.html#year_2017
  37. Online Learning Consortium (2016). Quality course teaching and instructional practice. OLC Quality Scorecard Suite. https://onlinelearningconsortium.org/consult/olc-quality-course-teaching-instructional-practice/
  38. Parker, A. G., Santos J. & Dancy, K. (2021, May). Online isn't optional: Student polling on access to internet and devices. Institute for Higher Education Policy. https://www.ihep.org/publication/online-isnt-optional/"
  39. Pozzi, F., Manca, S., Persico, D., & Sarti, L. (2007). A general framework for tracking and analyzing learning processes in computer‐supported collaborative learning environments. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703290701240929
  40. Reushle, S. & Mitchell, M. (2009). Sharing the journey of facilitator and learner: Online pedagogy in practice. Journal of Learning Design, 3(1), 11–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.5204/jld.v3i1.45
  41. Saadatmand, M., Uhlin, L., Åbjörnsson, L., & Kvarnström, M. (2017, January 22). Examining Learners’ interaction in an open online course through the Community of Inquiry framework. European Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 20(1), 61–79. https://doi.org/10.1515/eurodl-2017-0004
  42. Schrum, L., Burbank, M. D., Engle, J., Chambers, J. A., & Glassett, K. F. (2005). Post-secondary educators’ professional development: Investigation of an online approach to enhancing teaching and learning. Internet and Higher Education, 8(4), 279–289. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2005.08.001
  43. Shea, P., & Bidjerano, T. (2009). Community of inquiry as a theoretical framework to foster “epistemic engagement” and “cognitive presence” in online education. Computers and Education, 52(3), 543−553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2008.10.007
  44. Shea, P., Li, C. S. & Pickett, A. (2006). A study of teaching presence and student sense of learning community in fully online and web-enhanced college courses. Internet and Higher Education, 9(3), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2006.06.005
  45. Shea, P., Gozza-Cohen, M., Uzuner, S., Mehta, R., Valtcheva, A. V., Hayes, S., & Vickers, J. (2011). The community of inquiry framework meets the SOLO taxonomy: A process product model of online learning. Educational Media International, 48(2), 101–113. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/53486/
  46. Shelton, K. & Saltsman, G. (Eds.). (2014). Quality scorecard 2014 handbook: Criteria for excellence in the administration of online programs. The Online Learning Consortium.
  47. Smadi, O., Parker, S., Gillham, D. & Muller, A. (2019). The applicability of community of inquiry framework to online nursing education: A cross-sectional study. Nurse Education in Practice, 34, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nepr.2018.10.003
  48. Stein, D. S., Wanstreet, C. E., Calvin, J., Overtoom, C., & Wheaton, J. E. (2005). Bridging the transactional distance gap in online learning environments. The American Journal of Distance Education, 19(2), 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde1902_4
  49. Swan, K. (2001). Virtual interaction: Design factors affecting student satisfaction and perceived learning in asynchronous online courses. Distance Education, 22(2), 306–331. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158791010220208
  50. Swan, K., & Ice, P. (2010, January). The community of inquiry framework ten years later: Introduction to the special issue. The Internet and Higher Education, 13(1–2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.11.003
  51. Swan, K., & Shih, L. F. (2005). On the nature and development of social presence in online course discussions. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 9(3), 115−136. http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v9i3.1788
  52. Torras, M. E., & Mayordomo, R. (2011). Teaching presence and regulation in an electronic portfolio. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(6), 2284–2291. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2011.07.007
  53. Tricker, M., Rangecroft, M., & Long, P. (2001). Evaluating distance education courses: The student perception. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 26(2), 165–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930020022002
  54. Turula, A. (2017, February). Teaching presence in telecollaboration. Keeping an open mind. System 64, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.001
  55. Woods, K. & Bliss, K. (2016). Facilitating successful online discussions. Journal of Effective Teaching, 16(2), 76–92. https://uncw.edu/jet/articles/vol16_2/woods.pdf
  56. Young, S. (2006). Student views of effective online teaching in higher education. American Journal of Distance Education, 20(2), 65–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15389286ajde2002_2
  57. Zhu, M., Bonk, C. J., & Herring, S. C. (2019). Exploring presence in online learning through three forms of computer-mediated discourse analysis. Distance Education, 40(2), 205–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2019.1600365