Vol. 37 No. 1 (2022)
Research Articles

Online but Not Alone: Teachers’ Perceptions of Effective Online School Leadership (OSL)

HTML PDF
  • Awneet Sivia,
  • Dr. Joanne Robertson
Awneet Sivia
University of the Fraser Valley
Dr. Joanne Robertson
University of the Fraser Valley
Bio
DOI: https://doi.org/10.55667/ijede.2022.v37.i1.1230

Published 2022-06-30

How to Cite

Sivia, A., & Robertson, J. . (2022). Online but Not Alone: Teachers’ Perceptions of Effective Online School Leadership (OSL). International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.55667/ijede.2022.v37.i1.1230
Copyright Notice

Abstract

Online school leadership (OSL) is of particular interest given the growing number of online education opportunities. As school districts develop more online and blended learning programs, particularly for secondary grade students, the need to examine leadership in these programs is paramount. The literature suggests that most studies focus on effective leadership in bricks and mortar schools, while limited research focuses on leadership in online programs. In this study, we aimed to explore teachers’ perceptions of leadership in online secondary schools in two districts. Our questions focused on secondary teachers’ experiences with leaders in their online schools and how these experiences contribute to perceptions of what makes for effective leadership practices. Using phenomenology, we interviewed six teachers, analyzed for themes and categorized these into a sense of community, organizational learning and empowerment to represent teachers' perceptions of OSL. Based on these results, we suggest that OSL consists of both foundational and contextualized practices, and that both are necessary for effective OSL. This research has implications for educational leadership broadly, but specifically for leadership in online education.

 

 

HTML PDF

References

  1. Alotebi, H., Alharbi, O. & Masmali, A. (2018). Effective leadership in virtual learning environments. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(2)0, 156–-160. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijiet.2018.8.2.1026
  2. Arnesen, K. T., Hveem, J, Short, C. R., West, R. E., & Barbour, M. (2019). K-12 online learning journal articles: trends from two decades of scholarship. Distance Education, 40(10, 32–-53. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1553566
  3. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2802_3
  4. Barbour, M.K. (2018a). The landscape of K-12 online learning: Examining what is known. In M. G. Moore & W.C. Diehl (Eds.), Handbook of distance education (4th ed., pp. 521–-542). Routledge.
  5. Barbour, M.K. (2018b). Funding and resourcing of distributed learning in Canada: A special report of the State of the Nation: K-12 E-Learning in Canada project. Canadian e-Learning Network.
  6. Barbour, M. K., LaBonte, R., Kelly, K., Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T. Bond, A., & Hill, P. (2020). Understanding pandemic pedagogy: Differences between emergency remote, remote, and online learning. Canadian eLearning Network.
  7. Bass, B. M. (1990). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. Organizational Dynamics, 18, 19–-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(90)90061-S
  8. Beck, D., & Maranto, R. (2014). Empowering teachers? An exploratory study of personnel practices in virtual charter schools in the United States. Journal of Open Flexible and Distance Learning, 18(2), 59–81. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/150739/
  9. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. Harper & Row.
  10. Cavanaugh, C., Barbour, M., & Clark, T. (2009). Research and practice in K-12 online learning: A review of open access literature. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(1), 1–-22. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v10i1.607
  11. Cavanaugh, C. & Clark, T. (2007). The landscape of K-12 online learning. In Cavanaugh, C. & Blomeyer, B. (Eds.), What works in K-12 online learning. International Society for Technology in Education.
  12. Creswell, J.W. and Poth, J. (2018). Qualitative inquiry & research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th Eed.). Sage Publications.
  13. Donahoo, J. (2016). Collective efficacy: How educators’ beliefs impact student learning. Corwin.
  14. Donahoo, J. Hattie, J. & Eells, R. (2018). The power of collective efficacy. Educational Leadership, 75(6), 40–-44. ASCD. https://www.ascd.org/el/articles/the-power-of-collective-efficacy
  15. Fullan, M. (2013). The six secrets of change. In M. Grogan (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (3rd ed.) (., pp. 207–-219). Jossey-Bass.
  16. Fullan, M. (2019). Nuance: Why some leaders succeed and others fail. Corwin.
  17. Garrison, D. R. & Vaughan, N. D. (2013). Institutional change and leadership associated with blended learning innovation: Two case studies. Internet and Higher Education,18, 24–- 28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.09.001
  18. Goddard, R. Goddard, Y., Kim, E.S. & Miller, R. (2015). A theoretical and empirical analysis of the roles of instructional leadership, teacher collaboration, and collective efficacy beliefs in support of student learning. American Journal of Education, 121(4), 501–530. https://doi.org/10.1086/681925
  19. Hallinger, P. (2003). Leading educational change: Reflections on the practice of instructional and transformational leadership. Cambridge Journal of Education, 33(3), 329–-351. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305764032000122005
  20. Hallinger, P. & Murphy. J. (1986). The social context of effective schools. American Journal of Education, 94(3), 328–-355. https://doi.org/10.1086/443853
  21. Hallinger, P. & Wang, W.C. Assessing instructional leadership with the principal management rating scale. Springer.
  22. Hargreaves, A., & O’Connor, M. (2018). Collaborative professionalism: When teaching together means learning for all. Corwin.
  23. Hattie, J. (2016, July 11). Mindframes and Mmaximizers. 3rd Annual Visible Learning Conference held in Washington, DC.
  24. LaFrance, J. A., & Beck, D. (2014). Mapping the Terrain: Educational Leadership Field Experiences in K-12 Virtual Schools. Educ. Adm. Q. Educational Administration Quarterly, 50(1), 160–-189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13484037
  25. Leithwood, K., Harris, A., & Strauss, T. (2010). Leading school turnaround: How successful leaders transform low-performing schools. Jossey-Bass.
  26. Leithwood, K., Seashore Louis, K., Anderson, S. & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences student learning. Wallace Foundation. http://www.wallacefoundation.org/
  27. Lynch, M. (2012). A guide to effective school leadership theories. Routledge.
  28. Martin, F., Sun, T., & Westine, C. D. (2020). A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018. Computers & Education, 159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104009
  29. McLeod, S., & Richardson, J. W. (2014, January). School administrators and K-12 online and blended learning. In R. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds,)., Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 391–-402). Entertainment Technology Center Press, Carnegie Mellon University.
  30. Moerer-Urdahl, T. & Creswell, J. W. (2004). Using transcendental phenomenology to explore the “Ripple Effect” in a leadership mentoring program. International Journal of Qualitative Research, 3(2), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690400300202
  31. Morgan, H. (2015). Online instruction and virtual schools for middle and high school students: Twenty-first century fads or progressive teaching methods for today’s pupils? The Clearing House, 88, 72–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/00098655.2015.1007909
  32. Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage.
  33. Murphy, J. F. & Seashore Louis, K. (2018). Positive school leadership: Building capacity and strengthening relationships. Teachers College Press.
  34. Neumerski, C.M. (2012). Rethinking instructional leadership, a review: What do we know about principal, teacher, and coach instructional leadership, and where should we go from here? Educational Administration Quarterly 49(2), 310–347. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X12456700
  35. Northouse, P.G. (2019). Leadership: Theory and practice (8th ed.). Sage.
  36. Phelps, K. 2012. Leadership online: Expanding the horizon. New Directions for Student Services, 140, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/ss.20032
  37. Richardson, J. W., Beck, D., LaFrance, J., & McLeod, S. (2016). Job attainment and perceived role differences of cyberschool leaders. Educational Technology & Society, 19(1), 211–222. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/290391350
  38. Richardson, J. W., LaFrance, J., & Beck, D. (2015). Challenges of virtual school leadership. American Journal of Distance Education, 29(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923647.2015.992647
  39. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). Sage. Publishers.
  40. Salsberry, T. A. (2010). K–12 virtual schools, accreditation, and leadership: What are the issues? Educational Considerations, 37(2), 14–17. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/107413/
  41. Senge, P. (1990). The 5th discipline. Doubleday Publishing Group.
  42. Spillane, J. P., Halverson, R., & Diamond, J. B. (2001). Investigating school leadership practice: A distributed perspective. Educational Researcher, 30(3), 23–28. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X030003023
  43. Van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press.
  44. Wagner, T. & Kegan, R. (2013). Conclusion. In M. Grogan (Ed.), The Jossey-Bass reader on educational leadership (3rd ed., pp. 220–254). Jossey-Bass.
  45. Wenner, J.A., & Ho, D. (2017). The theoretical and empirical basis of teacher leadership: A review of the literature. Review of Educational Research, 87(1), 134-171. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0034654316653478