Vol. 29 No. 2 (2014)
Research Brief

Autonomy and Responsibility: Online Learning as a Solution for At-Risk High School Students

HTML ePub PDF
  • Somer Lewis,
  • Aimee L. Whiteside,
  • Amy Garrett Dikkers
Somer Lewis
University of North Carolina Wilmington
Bio
Aimee L. Whiteside
University of Tampa
Bio
Amy Garrett Dikkers
University of North Carolina Wilmington
Bio

Published 2014-10-14

Keywords

  • e-learning,
  • online education,
  • distance education,
  • educational technology,
  • instructional technology,
  • instructional design
    • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Lewis, S., Whiteside, A. L., & Garrett Dikkers, A. (2014). Autonomy and Responsibility: Online Learning as a Solution for At-Risk High School Students. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 29(2). Retrieved from https://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/883
Copyright Notice

Abstract

In this three-year, mixed methods case study, the benefits and challenges of online learning for at-risk high school students were examined. A key finding was that at-risk students identify the benefits and challenges of online learning to be the same. While students appreciate the opportunity to work ahead and study at their own pace, they see it as a challenge to be responsible for their own learning and manage their time. The authors of this paper argue that, with proper support structures in place, students who are at-risk for dropping out can overcome challenges and find success in an online learning environment.
HTML ePub PDF

References

  1. Archambault, L., Diamond, D., Coffey, M., Foures-Aalbu, D., Richardson, J., Zygouris-Coe, V., Brown, R., & Cavanaugh, C. (2010). Research committee issues brief: An exploration of at-risk learners and online education. Vienna, VA: International Association for K-12 Online Learning.
  2. Barbour, M. K. (2009). Today’s student and virtual schooling: The reality, the challenges, the promise. Journal of Distance Learning, 13(1), 5-25.
  3. Barbour, M. K. & Siko, J.P. (2012). Virtual schooling through the eyes of an at-risk student: A case study. European Journal of Open, Distance, and E-Learning, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2012/Barbour_Siko.pdf
  4. Cavanaugh, C. (2009). Getting students more learning time online: Distance education in support of expanded learning time in schools. Washington, D.C.: Center for American progress.
  5. Communities in Schools. (2011). Our initiatives. Retrieved from http://www.cisnc.org/initiatives/performance_learning_centers
  6. Communities in Schools. (2014). About us. Retrieved from http://www.communitiesinschools.org/about/
  7. Dicintio, M. & Gee, S. (1999). Control is key: Unlocking the motivation of at-risk students. Psychology in the Schools, 36(3) 231-237.
  8. Garrett Dikkers, A., Whiteside, A. L., & Lewis, S. (2012, September/October). Get present: Build community and connectedness online. Learning & Leading with Technology, 40(2), 22 25.
  9. Garrett Dikkers, A., Whiteside, A. L., & Lewis, S. (2013, Winter). Virtual high school teacher and student reactions to the Social Presence Model. Journal of Interactive Online Learning, 12(3), 156-170.
  10. Hammond, C., Linton, D., Smink, J., & Drew, S. (2007). Dropout risk factors and exemplary
  11. programs. Clemson, SC: National Dropout Prevention Center, Communities In Schools, Inc.
  12. Hupfeld, K. (2010). A review of the literature: Resiliency skills and dropout prevention. Denver, CO: Scholar Centric. Retrieved from http://www.scholarcentric.com/images/
  13. pdf/resiliency_skills/SC_Resiliency_WP_FNL.pdf
  14. Hurley, R. (2002). Fine-tuning an online high school to benefit at-risk students. T.H.E. Journal, 30(4), 33-34, 36, 38, 40.
  15. International Association for K-12 Online Learning. (2013, October). Fast facts about online learning. Vienna, VA: International Association for K-12 Online Learning.
  16. North Carolina Virtual Public School. (2013a). About us. Retrieved from http://www.ncvps.org/index.php/about-us/
  18. North Carolina Virtual Public School. (2013b). Home. Retrieved from http://www.ncvps.org/
  19. Rapp, K. E., Eckes, S. E., & Plurker, J. A. (2006). Cyber charter schools in Indiana: Policy implications of the current statutory language. Education Policy Brief, 4(3). Retrieved from http://ceep.indiana.edu/projects/PDF/PB_V4N3_Winter_2006_CyberCharter.pdf
  20. Smink, J., & Schargel, F. P. (Eds.). (2004). Helping students graduate: A strategic approach to dropout prevention. Clemson, SC: National Dropout Prevention Center/Network.
  21. Tompkins, R., & Deloney, P. (1994). Rural students at risk in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. Retrieved from http://www.sedl.org/rural/atrisk/
  22. U.S. Department of Education. (2009). The condition of education 2009 (NCES 2009-081. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics).
  23. Watson, J., & Gemin, B. (2008) Promising practices in online learning: Using online learning for at-risk students and credit recovery. Vienna, VA: International Association of K-12 Online Learning. Retrieved from http://www.inacol.org/research/promisingpractices/NACOL_CreditRecovery_PromisingPractices.pdf