Vol. 30 No. 1 (2015)
Research Articles

Use and Perception of Second Life by Distance Learners: The Effects of Orientation Session Timing

Jo-Anne Murray
University of Glasgow
Fiona Littleton
University of Edinburgh
Marshal Dozier
University of Edinburgh

Published 2015-03-11


  • Second Life,
  • Distance Education,
  • Educational Technology

How to Cite

Murray, J.-A., Littleton, F., & Dozier, M. (2015). Use and Perception of Second Life by Distance Learners: The Effects of Orientation Session Timing. International Journal of E-Learning & Distance Education Revue Internationale Du E-Learning Et La Formation à Distance, 30(1). Retrieved from https://ijede.ca/index.php/jde/article/view/898


Evidence suggests that Second Life (SL) is well received by those studying at a distance; however, little has been done to evaluate how a structured orientation session may affect students’ use and perception of SL. Consequently, this study explored orientation timing and its effect on a group of students registered in a part-time distance education master’s degree program at a large UK University open to international students. An online survey was designed and administered to assess students’ use and perception of SL use and whether these variables changed based on the timing of orientation to SL and its subsequent use. A series of Likert-type scale items were organized to gather the following information: student demographics; and students’ experience with, and thoughts of, SL. Results indicated that the use of an orientation session close to subsequent use of SL for learning activities did positively affect students’ use and perception of SL. Consequently, recommendations from the current findings suggest that if educators foresee a pedagogical benefit to using SL then it is important to ensure that students are provided with a timely and structured orientation to prior to its utilization.


  1. Baker, S. C., R. K. Wentz and M. M. Woods (2009). Using virtual worlds in education: Second Life as an educational tool. Teaching of Psychology 36, 59-64. doi:10.1080/00986280802529079
  2. Bates, A. W. (2005). Technology, E-learning and Distance Education. London, UK, Routledge. doi:10.4324/9780203463772
  3. Berge, Z. and M. Collins (1995). Computer-mediated communication and the online classroom in distance education. Computer-Mediated Communication Magazine 2(4), 6-13. Accessed: http://www.december.com/cmc/mag/1995/apr/berge.html
  4. Boellstorff, T. (2008). Coming of Age in Second Life. Oxford, NJ, Princeton University Press. doi:10.1111/j.1548-1352.2010.01088.x
  5. Broadribb, S. and C. Carter (2009). Using second life in human resource development. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(3), 547-550. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00950.x
  6. Bronack, S., R. Riedl, et al. (2006). Learning in the zone: a social constructivist framework for distance education in a 3D virtual world. Interactive Learning Environments 14(3), 219-232. doi:10.1080/10494820600909157
  7. Burbules, M. (2002). Like a version: playing with online identities. Educational Philosophy and Theory 34(4), 387-393. doi:10.1080/0013185022000011781
  8. Cheal, C. (2009). Student perceptions of a course taught in Second Life. Innovate: Journal of online Education 5(5). Accessed: http://www.academia.edu/305096/Student_Perceptions_of_a_Course_Taught_In_Second_Life.
  9. Childress, M. D. and R. Braswell (2006). Using massively multiplayer online role-playing games for online learning. Distance Education 27(2), 187-196. doi:10.1080/01587910600789522
  10. Clark, M. A. (2011). Genome Island: A virtual science environment in Second Life. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education 12(3). Accessed: http://tojde.anadolu.edu.tr/tojde43-2/pdf/Volume12Number3-2.pdf
  11. Cobb, S., R. Heaney, O. Corcoran and S. Henderson-Begg (2009). The learning gains and student perceptions of a Second Life virtual lab. Bioscience Education 13. doi:10.3108/beej.13.5
  12. Dalgarno, B., M. J. W. Lee, L. Carlson, S. Gregory and B. Tynan (2011). An Australian and New Zealand scoping study on the use of 3D immersive virtual worlds in higher education. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(1), 1-15. Accessed: http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet27/dalgarno.pdf
  13. De Lucia, A., R. Francese, I. Passero and G. Tortora (2009). Development and evaluation of a virtual campus on Second Life: The case of SecondDMI. Computers and Education 52, 220-233. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.08.001
  14. Dickey, M. D. (2005). Three-dimensional virtual worlds and distance learning: two case studies of Active Worlds as a medium for distance education. British Journal of Educational Technology 36(3), 439-451. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2005.00477.x.
  15. Dietz-Uhler, B., Fisher, A., and Han, A. (2008). Designing online courses to promote student retention. Journal of Educational Technology Systems 36(1), 105-112. doi:10.2190/et.36.1.g
  16. Edirisingha, P., M. Nie, M. Pluciennik and R. Young (2009). Socialization for learning at distance in a 3D multi-user virtual environment. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(3), 458-479. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00962.x
  17. Garrison, D. and T. Anderson (2003). E-learning in the 21st Century. London, UK, Routledge Falmer. doi:10.4324/9780203166093
  18. Gee, J. P. (2004). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. Computers in Education 1(1), 20. doi:10.1145/950566.950595
  19. Hew, K.F., and Cheung, W.S. (2010). Use of three-dimensional (3D) immersive virtual worlds on K-12 and higher education settings: A review of the research. British Journal of Educational Technology 41(1), 33-55. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00900.x
  20. Jarman, L. and J. Sanchez (2008). The educators coop experience in Second Life: a model for collaboration. Journal for the Research Centre for Educational Technology 4(2), 66-82.
  21. Kamel Boulos, M. N., L. Hetherington and S. Wheeler (2007). Second Life: an overview of the potential of 3D virtual worlds in medical and health education. Health Information and Libraries Journal 24, 233-245. doi:10.1111/j.1471-1842.2007.00733.x.
  22. Kirkup, G. (2001). Teacher or avatar? Identity issues in computer-mediated contexts. Using Learning Technologies: International Perspectives on Practice. E. J. Burge and M. Haughey. London, Routledge Falmer.
  23. Knapper, C. (1988). Lifelong learning and distance education. American Journal of Distance Education 2(1), 63-72. doi:10.1080/08923648809526609.
  24. Lee, M. J. W. (2009). How can 3D virtual worlds be used to support collaborative learning? An analysis of cases from the literature.Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society 5(1), 149-158. Accessed: http://www.je-lks.org/ojs/index.php/Je-LKS_EN/article/view/300/282
  25. Leh, A.S. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and social presence in a distance learning environment. International Journal of Educational Telecommunications 7(2), 109-128. Accessed: http://www.editlib.org/p/8470/
  26. Lowe, C. and M. A. Clark (2008). Student perceptions of learning science in a virtual world. 24th Annual Conference on Distance Teaching and Learning. Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
  27. McKerlich, R., M. Riis, T. Anderson and B. Eastman (2011). Student perceptions of teaching presence, social presence and cognitive presence in a virtual world. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 7(3), 324-336. Accessed: http://jolt.merlot.org/vol7no3/mckerlich_0911.htm
  28. Moore, M. G., & Kearsley, G. (2011). Distance Education: A Systems Review of Online Learning (3rd Edition). California, USA: Wadsworth. Accessed: http://www.cengagebrain.com.au/content/moore20992_1111520992_02.01_chapter01.pdf
  29. Rogers, L. (2009). Simulating clinical experience: Exploring Second Life as a learning tool for nurse education. Proceedings ascilite. Auckland, AUS. Accessed: http://www.ascilite.org.au/conferences/auckland09/procs/rogers.pdf
  30. Rovai, A. (2002). Building a sense of community at a distance. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning 3(1), 1-16. Accessed: http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/79/152
  31. Sanchez, J. (2009). Barriers to student learning in Second Life. Library Technology Reports, 45(2), 29-34. doi:10.5860/ltr.45n4
  32. Simkins, S., M. Maier and J. Rhem (2009). Just-In-Time Teaching: Across the Disciplines, and Across the Academy (New Pedagogies and Practices for Teaching in Higher Education). Virginia, USA, Stylus Publishing. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9647.2011.00733.x
  33. Steinkuehler, C. A. and D. Williams (2006). Where everybody knows your (screen) name: Online games as "third places". Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 11, 885-909. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00300.x
  34. Stott, D. (2007). Learning the second way. British Medical Journal 335(7630), 1122-1123. doi:10.1136/bmj.39400.460139.941
  35. Turkle, S. (1995). Life on the screen: identity in the age of the internet. London, UK, Weidenfeld and Nicolson. doi:10.1177/135485659700300112
  36. Warburton, S. (2009). Second Life in higher education: Assessing the potential for and barriers to deploying virtual worlds in learning and teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(3), 141-426. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00952.x
  37. Warburton, S. and M. Perez-Garcia (2009). 3D design and collaboration in massively multi-user virtual environments. Cases on Collaboration in Virtual Learning Environments: Processes and Interactions. D. Russel. Hershey, PA, IGI Global. doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-878-9.ch002
  38. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/cbo9780511803932.018
  39. Witmer, B. G. and M. J. Singer (1998). Measuring presence in virtual environments: A presence questionnaire. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments 95(5), 497-503. doi:10.1162/105474698565686